A New Kind of Warfare

Cybersecurity efforts in the United States have largely centered on defending computer networks against attacks by hackers, criminals, and foreign governments, mainly China. Increasingly, however, the focus is on developing offensive capabilities, on figuring out how and when United States might unleash its own malware to disrupt an adversary’s networks. That is potentially dangerous territory. Such malware is believed to have little deterrent value against criminals who use computers to steal money from banks, spies who pilfer the industrial secrets. Faced with rising intrusions against computers that run America’s military systems, its essential infrastructure, its power grid, for instance, its telecommunications networks, military here (and elsewhere) sees disruptive software as an essential new tool of war. According to a study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the 15 countries with biggest military budgets are all investing in offensive cyber capabilities. The latest step occurred last month when the United States sent out bids for technologies “to destroy, deny, degrade, disrupt, corrupt or usurp” an adversary’s attempt to use cyberspace for advantage. The Air Force asked for proposals to plan for and manage cyberwarfare, including the ability to launch superfast computer attacks and withstand retaliation. The United States, China, Russia, Britain and Israel began developing basic cyberattack capabilities at least a decade ago and are still figuring out how to integrate them into their military operations. The experts say cyberweapons will be used before or during conflicts involving conventional weapons to infect an adversary’s network and disrupt a target, including shutting down military communications. The most prominent example is Stuxnet virus deployed in 2010 by the United States and Israel to set back Iran’s nuclear program. Other cyberattacks occurred in 2007 against Syria and 1998 against Serbia. Crucial questions remain unanswered, including what laws of war would apply to decisions to launch an attack. United States still hasn’t figured out what impact cyberweapons could have on actual battlefield operations or when an aggressive cyber response is required. Nor has Washington settled on who would authorize an attack; experts see roles for both the president and military commanders. There is also unresolved issue of how to minimize collateral damage, like making sure malware does not cripple a civilian hospital. Another big concern is China, which is blamed for stealing American military secrets. Washington has not had much success persuading Beijing to rein in its hackers. There is a serious risk of miscalculation if, for example, there is a confrontation in South China Sea. China could misinterpret a move, unleash a cyberattack and trigger a real cyberwar. What’s clearly needed are new international understandings about what constitutes a cyber aggression and how governments should respond. Meanwhile, U.S. must do what it can to protect its own networks. (Editorial – NYTimes – 10/09/2012)


Acerca de ignaciocovelo
Consultor Internacional

One Response to A New Kind of Warfare

  1. Professor Uziel Nogueira says: There is an important difference between the cold war atomic age and a cyber-warfare today. In the former, the US and few other countries had the monopoly of the new super weapon. In fact, the US made use of a nuclear weapon against Japan while enjoying the monopoly of it in 1945. Only the Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) conundrum prevented a nuclear confrontation between the US and the former USSR during the Cuban crisis in 1962. The cyber warfare capability is spread all over the world.

    Many countries –and more worrisome, private enterprises — have the capability to develop powerful cyber weapons.

    Emerging powers will not allow a new atomic situation to be repeated in the cyber space today. The US – the most cyber space intensive economy in the world – is highly exposed to retaliation. The US-Israel use of cyber warfare against Iran’s nuclear facilities was a cue for other countries in the world.

    The cyber space is already THE new war theater in the 21st century. The only difference with the cold war is the absence of a threatening cyber mushroom cloud.



Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )


Conectando a %s

A %d blogueros les gusta esto: