German Military Rethinks Exporting Democracy

The German military may soon adopt new guidelines that call into question the export of democracy. In the future, Bundeswehr is to take greater account of local traditions and institutions, even if they are violent and corrupt. In his second inauguration address, US President George W. Bush vowed to redouble American efforts at exporting democracy around the world. “It is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture,” he said in January, 2005 speech, “with ultimate goals of ending tyranny in our world.” Seven difficult years later, however, situation in Afghanistan continues to demonstrate the challenges facing the spread of Western-style democracy. And Germany, for its part, has now begun to adjust its military policy accordingly. According to information obtained by SPIEGEL, overseas missions undertaken by the German military are no longer to be focused on exporting Western conceptions of democracy. Political systems are only viable, read new draft guidelines for overseas military missions, when they are founded on “local concepts of legitimacy.” The draft guidelines “for a coherent policy relative to fragile states” were developed jointly by German foreign, defense and development ministries. The paper indicates that intervention strategy must take into account local traditions and institutions, even if they don’t correspond to concepts of liberal democracy. In some cases, the new concept even supports cooperating with corrupt or violent elites. The paper says that it is the responsibility of each country to choose its leader and authorities and that it is difficult to influence such decisions from the outside. “An overly dominant role played by the international community can be harmful”. In the future, foreign military missions in “fragile states” are to be coordinated by a task force headed by Foreign Ministry. Despite shying away from overly zealous export of democratic principles, the paper clearly argues in favor of the use of force in foreign military missions. “Experience gained from international peace missions clearly shows that an initial robust profile can be a factor for ultimate success,” the paper reads. Still, as ongoing NATO negotiations show, withdrawing from such overseas missions can be difficult. Currently, Western allies are deadlocked in the search for sufficient post-withdrawal funding for Afghanistan. The US has committed to covering half of the €3.1 billion ($4 billion) per year necessary to equip and train Afghan security forces. Last week’s NATO summit in Brussels, however, brought little in the way of concrete pledges from other member states. Internally, Berlin has assumed it would ultimately be saddled with annual payments of no more than €150 million. Now, however, SPIEGEL has learned that the US is demanding at least €190 million from Germany. “An adjustment to the previously fixed corridor of €100 to €150 million should be taken into account,” reads a confidential Foreign Ministry document, which SPIEGEL has seen. (source: Der Spiegel – 23/04/2012)

Acerca de ignaciocovelo
Consultor Internacional

Responder

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Conectando a %s

A %d blogueros les gusta esto: